The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Enhancing Healthcare Accessibility and Patient Outcomes

Authors

  • Declan Foster Montgomery University of the Cumberlands
  • Easton Blake University of the Cumberlands

Keywords:

Healthcare accessibility, patient outcomes, telemedicine, telehealth, virtual care

Abstract

The rapid advancement of telemedicine has transformed healthcare delivery, particularly in improving accessibility and patient outcomes. This study examines the effectiveness of telemedicine in bridging healthcare gaps, especially for remote and underserved populations. Using a systematic review of recent empirical studies, this research evaluates telemedicine's impact on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. The findings indicate that telemedicine enhances healthcare accessibility by reducing geographical barriers and wait times while maintaining or improving the quality of care. Moreover, it facilitates timely medical consultations and chronic disease management, leading to better health outcomes. Despite these benefits, challenges such as technological barriers, data security concerns, and regulatory constraints remain. The study underscores the need for robust telemedicine policies and infrastructure to optimize its effectiveness in modern healthcare systems.

References

Bashshur, R., Doarn, C. R., Frenk, J. M., Kvedar, J. C., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (2020). Telemedicine and the COVID-19 pandemic, lessons for the future. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(5), 571-573.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2020). Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. The Lancet, 395(10227), 859.

Gajarawala, S. N., & Pelkowski, J. N. (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 218-221.

Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., & Shaw, S. (2018). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e100.

Keesara, S., Jonas, A., & Schulman, K. (2020). Covid-19 and health care’s digital revolution. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(23), e82.

Kvedar, J., Coye, M. J., & Everett, W. (2016). Connected health: A review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth. Health Affairs, 35(2), 194-199.

Mehrotra, A., Ray, K., Brockmeyer, D. M., Barnett, M. L., & Bender, J. A. (2021). Expanding telemedicine can reduce healthcare disparities. Health Affairs, 40(2), 220-229.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Shachar, C., Engel, J., & Elwyn, G. (2020). Implications for telehealth in a postpandemic future: Regulatory and privacy issues. JAMA, 323(23), 2375-2376.

Smith, A. C., Thomas, E., Snoswell, C. L., Haydon, H., Mehrotra, A., Clemensen, J., & Caffery, L. J. (2021). Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(2), 75-80.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

Wade, V. A., Eliott, J. A., & Hiller, J. E. (2020). A qualitative study of ethical, legal, and social issues in telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(5), 367-374.

Wootton, R. (2021). Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–an evidence synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(3), 135-150.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Declan Foster Montgomery, & Easton Blake. (2024). The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Enhancing Healthcare Accessibility and Patient Outcomes. Health Harmony: International Journal of Medicine, Health and Physiotherapy, 1(1), 47–53. Retrieved from https://health.ifrel.org/index.php/HealthHarmony/article/view/79